Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > <opublikowany i wysłany> > > Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Possibilities: >> >> (1) Forget about that "protection" business. If you do not >> want mistakes, use 'branch.*.merge' but otherwise we will >> continue to follow the good old "first set of branches" >> rule. > > What about marking default branch to merge explicitely using > "Merge:" in remotes/<repo>, or remote.<name>.merge? Sorry, how is that an improvement over the current branch.*.merge? and how would that help not breaking existing setups? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html