On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 10:44:07PM -0700, Brandon Casey wrote: >> Anyone else? :) > > Sorry to gang up on you. :) Heh. :b > I still think your 2/2 is worth doing independently, though. It is silly > that git-prune will not mention pruned objects without "-v", but will > mention temporary files. They should be in the same category. As I mentioned in an earlier message, I think the original thinking was that removing a temporary object should be an unusual occurrence that indicates a failure of some sort, so you want to inform the user who may want to investigate (of course the file's gone, so what's to investigate). Removing a stale object file on the other hand is just part of the normal operation. That is why the former is always printed out and the latter only when -v is used. That was the original thinking, but I don't think it matters very much. Printing both using the same conditions seems valid. My commit message should be scrapped and replaced with something like your paragraph though.. -Brandon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html