Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 07:49:47AM +0000, Michał Kiedrowicz wrote:
>
>> Jeff King <peff <at> peff.net> writes:
>>
>> > - for i in $(seq 1 $GIT_PERF_REPEAT_COUNT); do
>> > + for i in $("$PERL_PATH" -le "print for 1..$GIT_PERF_REPEAT_COUNT"); do
>>
>> Maybe you could introduce "test_seq" instead.
>
> I don't have a strong preference, as there are only two callsites. Do
> you want to make a patch?
If you run "for . in . . ." in t/, we see quite a many hits, so
"only two callsites" might be undercounting the candidates.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html