Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks from me as well. I'm still worried about whether the increased > use of canonicalize_url will introduce regressions for the existing > SVN 1.6 support, and I should have time to look it over this weekend. > > The comment in canonicalize_url "There wasn't a 1.6 way to do it" is > not true. The relevant thread on the git list had a little > conversation about keeping svn 1.4 support, but I'm not sure why > that's relevant, given that svn_canonicalize_path has worked largely > the same way starting with SVN 1.1 (and on the other hand had > significant changes in SVN 1.7). > > Hopefully you've looked this over carefully already and I'm worrying > needlessly. Thanks for reminding me, I went back to an old chroot 1.4.2 indeed does fail canonicalization. Will bisect and squash a fix in. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html