Re: [RFC 0/16] Introduce index file format version 5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Documentation/technical/index-file-format-v5.txt |  281 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> builtin/update-index.c                           |    5 +-
> cache-tree.c                                     |  145 ++++++++++++++++++
> cache-tree.h                                     |    7 +
> cache.h                                          |   96 +++++++++++-
> read-cache.c                                     | 1519 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> resolve-undo.c                                   |  129 ++++++++++++++++
> resolve-undo.h                                   |    3 +
> t/perf/p0002-index.sh                            |   33 ++++
> t/t2104-update-index-skip-worktree.sh            |   15 +-
> t/t3700-add.sh                                   |    1 +
> test-index-version.c                             |    2 +-
> 12 files changed, 2082 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)

This is not good (too many pluses in read-cache.c) if it comes from
format-patch. Does it?
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]