Re: Fix git-svn for SVN 1.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It just doesn't matter.

Why are we arguing over which solution will be 4% better two years from now,
or if my commits are formatted perfectly, when tremendous amounts of basic
work to be done improving git-svn?  The code is undocumented, lacking unit
tests, difficult to understand and riddled with bugs.

Either solution would be a vast improvement.  The most important thing is that
one of them actually gets done.  If both solutions offer a huge improvement,
do it the way the person actually writing the code wants to do it.  It'll be
more enjoyable for them, they'll be more likely to complete the work, and more
likely to stick around and code some more.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]