Re: [RFC v2 11/16] Add explanatory comment for transport-helpers refs mapping.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Junio,
>
> Florian Achleitner wrote:
>
>> transport-helpers can advertise the 'refspec' capability,
>> if not a default refspec *:* is assumed. This explains
>> the post-processing of refs after fetching with fast-import.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Achleitner <florian.achleitner.2.6.31@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The patch below adds a comment to fetch_with_import() explaining the
> loop that saves the fetched commit names after 'git fast-import' has
> done its work.  It avoids some confusion that Florian encountered on
> first reading about which refs the fast-import stream is supposed to
> use to write its result.

>
> (By the way, I guess I find the above paragraph clearer than Florian's
> commit message.  But aside from that, the patch seems good to me.)
>
> I would like to see the patch applied so the remote-svn series without
> it gets shorter and easier to review.

Sounds pretty safe, and as long as mentors and stakeholders in the
area are happy with what the comment says, I see no issue applying
it now.  Is it understood by all parties that Florian may need to
rebase the series on top of it?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]