Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] test: allow prerequisite to be evaluated lazily

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:45:00AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> And of course with non-broken probes, "-v" would also help to see exactly
>> when the probe is run, using which commands, and what output they
>> produced. E.g., for SYMLINKS, we should probably drop the stderr
>> redirection from the probe so we can see how "ln" complains.
>> 
>> It might also be worth doing a "say >&3" at the end of the check, too,
>> to tell "-v" users the outcome.
>
> Here is an updated version of my suggestion that does both of those
> things.  I think it should just be squashed into your patch.

Thanks. The changes look good.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]