Re: [PATCH 4/4] Move initialization of Git::SVN variables into Git::SVN.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Michael G. Schwern" <schwern@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Also it can compile on its own now, yay!
>
> Hmmm.

I agree with Michael's "yay" and also think it's fine that after
patch 3 it isn't there yet.

That's because git-svn.perl doesn't use Git::SVN on its own but helps
it out a little.  So even if we only applied patches 1-3, git-svn
would still work (maybe it's worth testing "perl -MGit::SVN" by hand
to avoid the "it's doubtful" about whether Git::SVN is self-contained
and replace it with a more certain statement?), and patch 4 just makes
it even better.

[...]
> In short:
>
>  - I didn't see anything questionable in 1/4;
>
>  - Calling up ::opt_prefix() from module in 2/4 looked ugly to me
>    but I suspect it should be easy to fix;
>
>  - 3/4 was a straight move and I didn't see anything questionable in
>    it, but I think it would be nicer if intermediate steps can be
>    made to still work by making 4/4 come first or something
>    similarly simple.
>
> If the issues in 2/4 and 3/4 are easily fixable by going the route I
> handwaved above, the result of doing so based on this round is ready
> to be applied, I think.
>
> Eric, Jonathan, what do you think?

I think this is pretty good already, though I also like your
suggestion re 2/4.

I haven't reviewed the tests these introduce and assume Eric has that
covered.

Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]