Re: [PATCH 1/3] retain reflogs for deleted refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexey Muranov <alexey.muranov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 26 Jul 2012, at 14:47, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>
>> So we haven't found any way to present both branches "foo" and
>> "foo/bar" on file system at the same time. How about when we a new
>> branch introduces such a conflict, we push the new branch directly to
>> packed-refs? If we need either of them on a separate file, for fast
>> update for example, then we unpack just one and repack all refs that
>> conflict with it. Attempting to update two conflict branches in
>> parallel may impact performance, but I don't think that happens often.
>> -- 
>> Duy
>
> How about simply deprecating "/" in branch name?

Err, it's not like nobody's using this feature (Junio does a heavy use
of it in particular) ...

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]