Michael G Schwern <schwern@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2012.7.25 3:19 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Michael G Schwern <schwern@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> How about the git-svn SVN 1.7 fix in general? All of these patch sets I'm >>> sending build on one another, is that going to be a problem? It's going to >>> come in about six parts. >> >> Judging from the rate of the discussion this is progressing, I was >> imagining that this series would be ready by 1.7.13 at the earliest, >> possibly back-merged to 1.7.12.X maintenance series, and 1.7.11.X >> maintenance series is no longer relevant by then. >> >> But I certainly do not mind seeing the series based on earlier >> maintenance releases, e.g. maint-1.7.9. There however are tons of >> other git-svn.perl and perl/ updates since then, so basing the >> series on the current maint branch to abandon 1.7.10.X and earlier >> but still leaving the door open to downmerge to 1.7.11.X may be a >> good trade-off. > > So... is that master or maint? Just let me know which one. I do not care too deeply either way, and in the end I think Eric should have the final say. Given that git://git.bogomips.org/git-svn.git/ has 'master' but nothing to build on 'maint', I would imagine that basing on master is just fine. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html