Re: git-svn SVN 1.7 fix, take 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael G Schwern <schwern@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> A big one is "do not blast 10 emails to a mailing list" but I gather that's ok
> here if a submission needs 10 commits to be well expressed and its done via
> git-send-email?  And then if patch #3 needs revision I'm to do it in a rebase
> and resend the whole 10 commits?  Am I to think of git-send-email less as a
> means of sending patches to a mailing list and more as a git transport mechanism?

Yes, yes and whatever (even though I think send-email is just a
better MUA/MSA when you want to send patches and isn't restricted
for a _git_ transport, I do not think it matters how you look at it).

> I'm trying to bust it up into easier to digest pieces.  I came into this cold
> without much knowledge of the problem ("something to do with
> canonicalization") and no knowledge of the code.

Perhaps it is a good idea to lurk and see how others submit their
topics first?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]