Hi,
Ramsay Jones wrote:
> The only problematic platforms I test on are "NTFS/bash" on cygwin and MinGW.
> Since commit 2b843732 ("Suppress some bash redirection error messages",
> 26-08-2008), I have not noticed any complaints regarding this problem.
Yeah, that probably took care of squashing the messages. Maybe my
memory is too long. ;-)
[...]
> No, I don't think this would be a good direction to go in. This may
> not be a good idea either, but if you wanted to add a check here, then
> maybe something like this (totally untested):
>
> diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
> index acda33d..53a2422 100644
> --- a/t/test-lib.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
> @@ -354,6 +354,9 @@ test_done () {
> case "$test_failure" in
> 0)
> # Maybe print SKIP message
> + if test -n "$skip_all" && test $test_count -gt 0; then
> + error "Can't use skip_all after running some tests"
> + fi
> [ -z "$skip_all" ] || skip_all=" # SKIP $skip_all"
>
> if test $test_external_has_tap -eq 0; then
I think preventing invalid TAP output like this would be a very good
thing! As a start, this patchlet looks good to me, and then I guess
we'll have to think more about what happens when a person wants to
skip_all_remaining after a test has already been run.
Care to format it as a "git am"-able patch, or should I?
Thanks again,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html