Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > But what _should_ it show for such an entry? There is no commit to show > in the reflog walker, but it would still be nice to say "BTW, there was > a deletion even here". Obviously just skipping it and showing the next > entry would be better than the current behavior of stopping the > traversal, but I feel like there must be some better behavior. Like showing an entry that says "Ref deleted here", which should be easy to do by creating a phoney commit object and inserting it to the queue the reflog walker uses, I would guess. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html