Re: pushing branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes.
>
>> Hence does not make sense to ask git to do "push origin master" while
>> inside feature-work branch.
>
> No.  As long as you know your master is ready and suitable to be
> published when you ask "push", the command perfectly makes sense; it
> does not matter on what branch you are on.
>
> You may say
>
>         $ git checkout master
>         ... work work work ...
>         $ make test
>         ... ahh, perfection! ...
>         $ git checkout -b feature
>         ... let's build a bit more ..
>         ... while I am having fun, let's not forget to push the
>         ... part that is already solid out
>         $ git push origin master
>
> and that is perfectly fine without "git checkout master" before
> pushing (and "git checkout feature" after to come back to what you
> were doing).
In my case it wouldn't because I do not modify my master branch, I
just fetch upstream, merge upstream/master into my local master branch
and switch to feature-work, then git push origin master will always
give me "Everything up-to-date" I suppose (that is what always happen
in my case/workflow).

And just learned, the answer to my question is, while in feature-work
branch, 'git push origin feature-work'. Which does what I wanted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]