Hi, At $day_job we want to start publishing a subtree of our codebase as open source. As we audit and prep more sections of the code base, we'll be broadening the subtree(s) that we export, until eventually we want as close as possible to the whole thing to be open source. The resulting public repo would only contain commits from the master branch that touch the "open" parts of the tree, so while the result wouldn't be complete or coherent, it would produce a "read-only" open source artifact and allow us to start sharing code today rather than a year or two years from now when the entire code base is audited. I'm thinking of (ab)using filter-branch from a post-receive hook as a means to do this. Does this sound sane, or are there better options? Specifically, I was thinking of doing the following: - on pushing into our authoritative repo, we replicate to a second "scratch" repo where all the dirty work gets done - the scratch repo has a master branch, and an initial "open" branch created using `git filter-branch` - a post-receive hook in the scratch repo, given a series of commits A..B on the master branch, cherry-picks them onto the "open" branch, producing commits A'..B' - the hook runs `git filter-branch` on the "open" branch over commits A'..B', filtering the not-yet-open parts of the tree and dropping empty commits - the hook pushes the resulting HEAD to a public repo Thoughts? Closest to this idea that I've been able to find online so far is [1]. Cheers, Wincent [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2296047/repeatedly-using-git-filter-branch-to-rewrite-new-commits -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html