Re: [PATCH] Attempt to make git-checkout man page a bit more clear.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:47:42 -0800
Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The 'restore from arbitrary tree-ish' form does not take -m as
> far as I know.
> 
> Although it might be interesting to do a single-file three-way
> merge, I do not think the command is _checkout_ anymore once it
> starts doing that.

Yeah, I should have caught that.  As well, your explanation makes me
wonder if it makes sense to change <branch> in the third form to
<tree-ish> ?  Would you like an updated patch or will you just make
the touch up(s) yourself?

Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]