On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 19:20 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > --- a/builtin/branch.c
> > +++ b/builtin/branch.c
> > @@ -864,10 +864,32 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> > info and making sure new_upstream is correct */
> > create_branch(head, branch->name, new_upstream, 0, 0, 0, quiet, BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE);
> > } else if (argc > 0 && argc <= 2) {
> > + struct branch *branch = branch_get(argv[0]);
> > + const char *old_upstream = NULL;
> > + int branch_existed = 0;
> > +
> > if (kinds != REF_LOCAL_BRANCH)
> > die(_("-a and -r options to 'git branch' do not make sense with a branch name"));
> > +
> > + /* Save what argv[0] was pointing to so we can give
> > + the --set-upstream-to hint */
>
> Multi-line comments are usually written in Git as
>
> /*
> * multi-line
> * comment
> */
I've seen this style often, but sure.
>
> > + if (branch_has_merge_config(branch))
> > + old_upstream = shorten_unambiguous_ref(branch->merge[0]->dst, 0);
>
> Broken indentation.
Yeah, sorry. New laptop, hadn't got the default style fixed in the
config.
>
> > + if (argc == 1) {
> > + printf("If you wanted to make '%s' track '%s', do this:\n", head, argv[0]);
>
> Could be marked for translation with _("...").
Done.
>
> > + if (branch_existed)
> > + printf(" $ git branch --set-upstream '%s' '%s'\n", argv[0], old_upstream);
>
> old_upstream may be NULL at this point. I guess you want to skip this
> line if old_upsteam is NULL.
We've just set up tracking for it, so we'd want to undo that. Which
means --unset-upstream would have to move earlier in the series so we
can suggest that.
>
> The fact that I could find this bug suggests that this lacks a few new
> tests too ;-).
Indeed :) the next round will have them.
>
> > + else
> > + printf(" $ git branch -d '%s'\n", argv[0]);
> > +
> > + printf(" $ git branch --set-upstream-to '%s'\n", argv[0]);
>
> For the 3 printf()s: we usually display commands without the "$", and
> separate them from text with a blank line. See for example what "git
> commit" says when you didn't provide authorship:
Yeah, I was going by what Junio wrote in his mail. We should probably
have a double-LF as well, like in the message below.
>
> You can suppress this message by setting them explicitly:
>
> git config --global user.name "Your Name"
> git config --global user.email you@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> After doing this, you may fix the identity used for this commit with:
>
> git commit --amend --reset-author
>
> (the absence of $ sign avoids the temptation to cut-and-paste it)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html