Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Marcin Owsiany <marcin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> This makes my idea to do the same to "my something else instead of > >> master" much less attractive. In fact I don't think such behaviour would > >> be useful. > >> > >> I think with the suggested patch git-svn works as I would like it to: > >> - creates "master" at initial checkout - consistent with git clone > >> - using a different "tracking-like" branch is possible with "dcommit" > >> - does not re-create "master" on fetch - so the annoying part is gone > > > > Any comments? > > Not from me. Even though I'd love to hear Eric's opinion, your "I > don't think such behaviour would be useful." gave me an impression > that you would justify the change in a different way (i.e. a rewrite > of proposed log message) or tweak the patch (i.e. a modified > behaviour), or perhaps both, in your re-roll, the ball was in your > court, and we were waiting for such a rerolled patch. Sorry, I keep forgetting this topic. But yes, I thought you would tweak your patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html