Re: git-clone ignores umask for working tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Alex Riesen wrote:

> Hi list,
> 
> when git-clone was built in, its treatment of umask has changed: the shell
> version respected umask for newly created directories by using plain mkdir(1),
> and the builtin version just uses mkdir(work_tree, 0755).
>
> Is it intentional?

I have the vague feeling that it was intentional, but it's entirely 
plausible that I just overlooked that mkdir(2) applies umask and went for 
the mode that you normally want. I don't think there's any particular need 
for this operation to be more restrictive than umask.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]