Max Horn <max@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> +'<rev>{caret}@', e.g. 'HEAD{caret}@'::
> + A suffix '{caret}' followed by an at sign
> + means all parents of '<rev>'.
> + This is somewhat different from the other specifiers in this
> + section in that it may refer to multiple commits at once.
> + See also the next section on SPECIFYING RANGES.
Looks good.
> +'<rev>{caret}!', e.g. 'HEAD{caret}!'::
> + A suffix '{caret}' followed by an exclamation mark
> + means commit '<rev>' but forces all of its parents to be excluded. For
> + commands that deal with a single revision, this is the same as '<rev>".
Is this sentence correct? "git commit -C 'HEAD^!'" might be a
command that expects a single revision, but I do not think it is the
same as "git commit -C HEAD".
> + Hence it is primarily used with commands expecting commit ranges.
That is correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html