luke@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:20 +0100: > On 04/07/12 14:34, Pete Wyckoff wrote: > >The code is unused. Delete. > > I've used that non-interactive code path in the past, in the very > early days of using it (setting interactive to false manually). > > The nice thing about it is that if you're using git-p4 for the very > first time it lets you do the final submission to p4 by hand, > without having to trust the script to do the right thing. Once I > convinced myself that git-p4 was doing the right thing, I then > stopped using it. > > Is it worth retaining, perhaps fixed so that it can be set on the > command line and documented? Or just discard? My biggest complaint is that there's no way to enable the option. You have to edit the code to change self.interactive to False, as you pointed out. Then it doesn't help you with the submit message, and doesn't do the little details of cleaning up pure-copied files or changing the username for preserveUser. What you're doing makes sense, though, but maybe there's a cleaner way to provide that functionality. We could build the change then say "type p4 submit -c ... if it looks good". Still doesn't handle the little details. We could spawn a shell to let them go inspect. We could try to implement a "--continue" option, and give them a chance to edit. I've got an upcoming series that changes the interaction loop on conflict, and makes it easier to do some interaction at each patch, possibly before applying too. Might make things easier. -- Pete -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html