Thanks for your clarifications ! stars 2 & 3 are still not clear for me. Probably because I am new to git. Do you think that if a solution is found, in the hypothesis it respects both git & strong cryptography, it would have success ? My analyse is that small enterprises that do not have many servers nor premises may need git hosting. Even big companies with their own networks if they want more security. TrueCrypt or encrypted file system on the host is not feasible off the shelves. One have to settle its own dedicated server at the host. On my side, I am afraid to push my projects in clear into a host. But possibly I am too much paranoïde. Do you have an idea of the risk ? -- View this message in context: http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/Transparently-encrypt-repository-contents-with-GPG-tp2470145p7561687.html Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html