Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > == Outlook for the next week == > > - Continue implementing the API as discussed on [5]. > > [5] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/198283/focus=198474 Sorry for being rather slow this week! I still intend to do another review of the github code RSN, however I felt I should point out some more IRC conclusions to the list. I talked Thomas out of going forward with the API as the next step, and instead work towards having a writer side for the current format. This should have some benefits: * The code becomes more easily testable, and hopefully able to run the test suite. * Spelling the writer in code should shake down any unforeseen deficiencies of the format. Until update-index or similar learn to use the partial writing facilities, we should have a little extra tool here that allows poking at a single entry for testing. * The API will need to have an updating and a writing side, and what that should look like will become clearer. That does mean that the API-demo in git-ls-files (suggested by Duy) will likely have to wait until after midterms. -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html