Re: [PATCH 0/5] transport: unify ipv4 and ipv6 code paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These patches eliminate some ifdef-ery concerning NO_IPV6.  I used
> them when writing the SRV patch, which applies on top, but it's
> probably best to think of it as an independent topic.
>
> Patch 4 is the heart of the series.  It provides an interface similar
> to getaddrinfo that can be implemented on top of either gethostbyname
> or getaddrinfo and puts each implementation in a separate file.  This
> way, callers can just use the common API and they do not need to have
> two copies of their code, one for each host resolution API.
>
> Patches 1-3 move code around until all the code that patch 4 touches
> is in one place.
>
> Patches 5 is a potential error handling improvement noticed while
> writing patches 1-4.  It's probably not actually needed but it was a
> comfort to me.
>
> These patches have been in use in Debian since June of last year.  I'd
> like to see this in mainline early in the 1.7.11 cycle to make coding
> that touches this area during that cycle more pleasant.  Thoughts of
> all kinds welcome.

What happened to this series?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]