On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:39 PM, René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 06.06.2012 20:17, schrieb Felipe Contreras: > >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>>> The last remaining sticking point is what to do with the duplicated >>>>> shell >>>>> function. >>>> >>>> >>>> What is the problem with leaving it as it is; having it as a duplicate >>>> function. It's not a *huge* maintenance burden, and it's a big problem >>>> if the functions diverge. > > > In the last sentence you say that there would be a "big problem". > > >>> It is not even funny to see these two conflicting claims made in a >>> single sentence. Given that you are aware that it will cause a huge >>> problem to the end users if they diverge, >> >> >> What would be that *huge* problem? > > > Here you ask what's so bad about it. > > Perhaps you meant to write "it's NOT a big problem" in the first place? Yeap, that's what I meant. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html