Re: git-svn: follow parent after the fact?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Wong wrote:
The final set of files at the latest (svn) revision was inconsistent?
That should never happen...  If so, I'd very much like to look into this.

Yes, that's right; there are about 50 files that were in the original trunk before it was renamed but weren't in the branch that became the new trunk. Those files are present in the git repo if I use plain git-svn fetch, but they're not there in an svn client or in a git repo where I've used --follow-parent.

So far I haven't been able to come up with a from-scratch test case to demonstrate this behavior. The svn repository in question, unfortunately, isn't a public one. I've asked the person in charge of the repo if he remembers what exactly he did at the time of the branch reorganization; so far every permutation I've tried in my test repo has worked fine and not had the problem, so something odd must have happened in that repo's history.

I'll follow up if/when I manage to get a good test case.

-Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]