Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:37:52AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > This just doesn't make sense to me. Why would we treat annotated but >> > unsigned tags differently from signed tags? In both cases, the new >> > behavior is keeping more information about what happened, which is >> > generally a good thing. >> > >> > I haven't seen any good argument against creating these merges[1]. >> >> It is in line with --ff-only special casing, though. > > Is it? My impression from reading b5c9f1c is that --ff-only trumps both > annotated _and_ signed tags. Which makes sense to me. What I was > objecting to is that "some tag objects are more equal than others". It's > OK to treat unannotated tags differently from tag objects, but treating > annotated but unsigned objects differently from signed objects seems > unnecessary and complex. OK, let's drop it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html