Lanny Ripple <lanny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Perhaps the error message in git-am could be modified to indicate > sed is a suspect?. E.g., > > lanny(master);<work/IdeaProjects/Piper> git rebase master rl-clean292 > First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... > /sw/lib/git-core/git-am: line 692: Leblond: command not found > Patch does not have a valid e-mail address. (Used /sw/bin/sed found on PATH). > ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ > lanny((ae6c220...)|REBASE);<work/IdeaProjects/Piper> Hrm, that does not sound an attractive way going forward. Do we have to suspect any and all uses of POSIX tools, just in case somebody installs a broken implementation from random places? Is sed the only thing that is possibly broken? By the way, have you filed a bug report to whoever supplied your /sw/bin/sed? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html