On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:05:34AM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote: >> It would probably be better to have progress.c check isatty(2) all the time, >> but that wouldn't allow things like 'git push --progress' to force progress >> reporting to on, so I won't try to solve the general case right now. > > This looks better. There is a slight inaccuracy in your subject line, > though. We are not defaulting to quiet if !isatty(2) in all cases, but > rather only when we call into unpack_trees, which generates the progress > output. We will still print the ahead/behind line, detached HEAD info, > etc. > > Which I think is the right behavior, but is not quite what is advertised > by your commit message. Good point, fixed. Thanks! Avery -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html