[PATCH 2/3] xdiff: avoid more compiler warnings with XDL_FAST_HASH on 32-bit machines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hide literals that can cause compiler warnings for 32-bit architectures in
expressions that evaluate to small numbers there.  Some compilers warn that
0x0001020304050608 won't fit into a 32-bit long, others that shifting right
by 56 bits clears a 32-bit value completely.

The correct values are calculated in the 64-bit case, which is all that matters
in this if-branch.

Reported-by: Øyvind A. Holm <sunny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 xdiff/xutils.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xdiff/xutils.c b/xdiff/xutils.c
index 8580da7..78549e3 100644
--- a/xdiff/xutils.c
+++ b/xdiff/xutils.c
@@ -272,7 +272,13 @@ static inline long count_masked_bytes(unsigned long mask)
 		 * that works for the bytemasks without having to
 		 * mask them first.
 		 */
-		return mask * 0x0001020304050608 >> 56;
+		/*
+		 * return mask * 0x0001020304050608 >> 56;
+		 *
+		 * Doing it like this avoids warnings on 32-bit machines.
+		 */
+		long a = (REPEAT_BYTE(0x01) / 0xff + 1);
+		return mask * a >> (sizeof(long) * 7);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Modified Carl Chatfield G+ version for 32-bit *
-- 
1.7.10.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]