Re: [PATCH 2/2] submodule: fix handling of supermodules with relative origin URLs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Am 19.05.2012 06:40, schrieb Jon Seymour:
>>
>> Just a small nit: I'd prefer to replace the 4 occurrences of the term
>> "supermodule" with "superproject".
>
> Sure. I can't argue with precedent, of course, but I guess I was
> favouring the consistency in the suffixes used with sub and super.

We fairly consistently say (even outside the documentation---for example,
listen to the TechTalk Linus gave in May 2007) "superproject" and never
"supermodule".  You can tell people who were not paying attention when
they say "supermodule" ;-).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]