On Monday 2006 December 18 08:09, Junio C Hamano wrote: > By definition each reflog entry says "it was pointing at this > object before, and it was changed by this user to point at that > object at this time and the reason for the change was this". I'm daft. I've realised, pruning doesn't remove the ref, it removes one of the hashes in the reflog. I withdraw my comment. I'd imagined it' as the opposite of a creation. 000000 abcdef branch created abcdef 000000 branch deleted Which is fine, except that isn't what prune is doing at all. > I personally do not think recording "at this point these things > were pruned" makes _any_ sense whatsoever --- if you care about I think you're right. :-) Andy -- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html