Re: [PATCH] Update "gc" behavior in commit, merge, am, rebase and index-pack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'm good with always warning too. The moment it shows up, I can just
>> open another terminal for "gc". Though (I guess) a new user in the
>> middle of the work may not want to do that as they fear "gc" may
>> interfere their work.
>
> If we know that it won't interfere with their work, can we just spawn
> git gc as a background process?

I thought of that for index-pack, but we would need to deal with error
messages from gc messing up with foreground command's. I don't like a
command leaving background processes (without asking me) after it
exits, so index-pack should hang on until gc finishes. Which is ok for
long time commands like index-pack, but not ok for commit, rebase...
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]