Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Well, logically, if you do that, then you should also allow
>
> git log master@{one.week.ago..yesterday}
>
> as a reflog expression.
> ...
> PS. Yeah, I'm only half serious. I like our revision parsing, and the
> above _would_ actually be consistent with the "master@{1..3}" kind of
> specification, but at the same time, it's also obviously more complex, and
> maybe it's not THAT usable.
>
> But I think the "master@{date..date}" syntax would actually fall out
> automatically if you did the {x..y} parsing at a higher level and didn't
> force "x" and "y" to be digits only.
Syntax, yes, usage of it in "git show" yes,
But giving it to "git log" would not work as a naive user would
expect, which your example suggested ;-).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html