Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 05:25:04PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > >> There is no reason not to, as the user has to explicitly ask >> for it, so we are not breaking compatibility by doing so. We >> can do this simply by moving the "show_branch" flag into >> the wt_status struct. As a bonus, this saves us from passing >> it explicitly, simplifying the code. > > I forgot this, which should probably be squashed in: > > -- >8 -- > Subject: status: fix "--porcelain -z -b" documentation > > It is no longer the case that "-z" will not respect "-b". > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> All patches looked good. I thought that this deserved to eventually land on 'maint', so I did my usual "am first to master primarily to populate the object database with exact blob objects, then rebase the result to 'maint' while resolving conflicts both textual and semantic, and finally attempt to merge it back to 'master'" dance to come up with a two topic branches. The result is queued in 'pu'. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html