You're right. I will send this patch to gawk developers. Thanks to your advice! 2012/5/6 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Yi, EungJun <semtlenori@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: "Yi, EungJun" <semtlenori@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> occured => occurred > > In d18f76d I changed compat/regex to use the engine from gawk, there > have been a few fixes of ours to it since then, some of which may be > applicable for upstream inclusion: > > $ git --no-pager log --oneline --reverse d18f76d.. -- compat/regex > a997bf4 compat/regex: get the gawk regex engine to compile within git > de83172 Change regerror() declaration from K&R style to ANSI C (C89) > b50f370 compat/regex: define out variables only used under RE_ENABLE_I18N > 178b331 compat/regex: get rid of old-style definition > ce518bb Fix compat/regex ANSIfication on MinGW > > But I don't think we should be taking patches like these. I think they > should instead be sent to the upstream gawk developers who I'm sure > would be happy to take them. > > But this is not code that we're maintaining, and patches like these > just make it harder to merge the code from upstream. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html