Re: Index format v5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Ronan Keryell
<Ronan.Keryell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 3 May 2012 19:25:12 +0200, Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>
>    Thomas> I have been drafting the Version 5 of the index format over
>    Thomas> the past few days with the help of Thomas Rast, Michael
>    Thomas> Haggerty, cmn and barrbrain on IRC. It will save with prefix
>    Thomas> compression on the path, and using a crc32 over the stat
>    Thomas> data, instead of the full data, since it is only used for
>    Thomas> checking if the file is changed. (Thanks Michael Haggerty
>    Thomas> for this hint. Unless we are missing something this will
>    Thomas> save another ~4 MB on the Webkit index.
>
> Great!
>
> But I wonder whether it may not worth to investigate a 64-bit version for
> the offsets and so on, just in case...

64-bit versions of the offsets were taken into consideration, but currently
the Webkit index (the largest I know) has a size of 26 Mb, which is
reduced to about 15 MB or less with the v5 format. With 32-bit we can
address 4GB, which is about 266 times the Webkit index. Therefore there
probably is no use for 64-bit offsets in the years to come.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]