Re: Index format v5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> So what's wrong in this thinking?

We tolerate giving occasional false positive "Yes" to "Has this changed?",
but do not allow false negative "No".  So the value st_{ino,dev,uid,gid}
gives us is strictly "these are not likely to change, but if even a single
bit in them change, we need to suspect that it may have changed."  The
primary field that protect us is mtime, and all the rest are more or less
belt-and-suspender safety.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]