Re: [PATCH/RFC] avoid accessing _all_ loose refs in git-show-ref

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> 	This is kind of quick and dirty.

Maybe I am blind, but why don't you just do a resolve_ref()
regardless of packedness?  It only builds the packed refs list
when it is not found as a loose ref, and never builds the loose
refs list.  You probably would want to reject the ones that says
REF_ISSYMREF.

> 	An alternative would be to pack the tags _per default_. I once
> 	argued for that, but it appears nobody liked that idea. I even
> 	proposed to pack _all_ refs, and I still think this would be
> 	a good idea.

I do not think packing all refs is such a good idea.  Branches
are meant to be worked on and extended so the packed ones
would become stale quickly.  Packing all tags by default is
something we would want when everybody knows how to handle
them.

> 	Isn't it a bug that --verify succeeds, if only _one_ ref passed to 
> 	the command exists?

I think --verify should insist a single parameter, just like
rev-parse.

So wouldn't the code be like:

	if (verify) {
		int flag;
        	if (pattern[1])
                	die("Eh?");
		if (resolve_ref(pattern[0], sha1, 1, &flag) &&
                	(flag & REF_ISSYMREF) == 0) {
                		printf("%s %s\n",
                                	sha1_to_hex(sha1), pattern[0]);
				exit(0);
		} else
                	die("no match");
	}

???

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]