>>>>> "Rich" == Rich Pixley <rich.pixley@xxxxxxxx> writes: Rich> What I'm talking about is the situation where a branch can have multiple, Rich> childless commits. I've switched to calling these "tips" for this Rich> discussion. But in git, a branch *is* what you're calling a "tip". What do you find lacking about git branches, in terms of sharing? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html