[magit] Re: Bug in git-stash(.sh) ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



30 minutes ago, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> I think the root cause of the bug is that there are three cases:
> 
>  - If we ask for "log -g ref@{0}", we should show them counted no
>    matter what.
> 
>  - If we ask for "log -g ref@{now}", we should show them timed no
>    matter what.
> 
>  - If we ask for "log -g ref" without specifier, we show them
>    counted by default, but we try to be nice and show them timed
>    when we can infer from other context that the user wanted to see
>    them timed.

Ah, I was unaware (unsurprisingly) that *that's* how an explict date
format is (supposed to?) requested -- but then what happens with

  git log --date iso -g "ref@{0}"

?

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]