On 4/25/12 9:15 PM, Subho Banerjee wrote:
---> I see in the code that it says that the API is experimental. Is there any absolute need for backward compatibility, or can I try to redesign the API somewhat extensively?
If you stick to putting new APIs under different namespaces, or new functions, then you should be able to preserve API compatibility. I think Git.pm is now too widely used for breaking compatibility to be an option.
I think I submitted a Git::Config to this list some time ago; did you find that?
Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html