Re: Build without BUILT_INS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> And no, it will *not* be a compilation option, as the resulting
> installation will break the age-old promise we made to script writers.

A compilation option, does not break any promise to script writers.

The default build still has hard links.

A compilation option, such as "make NO_BUILTINS=1" would merely give
users the choice to build without the hard links; an option they do
_not_ have currently.

Seeing how there already is

NO_GETTEXT
NO_OPENSSL
NO_TCLTK

and so on, I dont see this as being a big issue to add.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]