On 04/21/2012 06:08 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael Haggerty<mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
"Atomic" implies that either the whole push succeeds or the whole push
fails, and that readers will never see part of the push.
Oh, I didn't mean "atomic" in that strict sense. After all this was a
description at the workflow level--what the human user perceives.
That's what I suspected.
Given that the word "atomic", for technical people, has a strict meaning
that is not met here, and for non-technical people probably only means
"nuclear", I suggest that the word be avoided in this explanation. Perhaps
* `matching` - push all branches having the same name in both ends.
This is for those who prepare all the branches into a publishable
shape and push them out atomically, and suitable when pushing to a
non-shared repository. [...]
could be changed to
* `matching` - push all branches having the same name in both ends.
This allows those who prepare all the branches into a publishable
shape to push them out to a non-shared repository with a single
> command. [...]
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html