On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:58:21AM -0400, Marc Branchaud wrote: > Git is better off describing what's appeared in the remote repo, and not > worrying about describing how the user might've mapped those things to local > refs. That's my preference, as well, so it sounds like you, Junio, and I are all in agreement. > (That said, patching fetch.c to do that is a bit beyond me at the moment. > Where would I find the remote's name for the ref?) During transfer operations, the remote side of the pair is generally pointed to by the peer_ref member of "struct ref" (so just use "ref->peer_ref->name" instead of "ref->name"). -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html