Instead of just saying that no upstream exists for such branch,
which is true but not very helpful, check that there's no
refs/heads/barnhc_wiht_tpyo and tell it to the user.
Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx>
---
sha1_name.c | 5 ++++-
t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sha1_name.c b/sha1_name.c
index c2fe1aa..e2d576a 100644
--- a/sha1_name.c
+++ b/sha1_name.c
@@ -862,8 +862,11 @@ int interpret_branch_name(const char *name, struct strbuf *buf)
*/
if (!upstream)
return error("HEAD does not point to a branch");
- if (!upstream->merge || !upstream->merge[0]->dst)
+ if (!upstream->merge || !upstream->merge[0]->dst) {
+ if (!ref_exists(upstream->refname))
+ return error("No such branch: '%s'", cp);
return error("No upstream branch found for '%s'", upstream->name);
+ }
free(cp);
cp = shorten_unambiguous_ref(upstream->merge[0]->dst, 0);
strbuf_reset(buf);
diff --git a/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh b/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh
index 2f4f0d1..2b8ba31 100755
--- a/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh
+++ b/t/t1507-rev-parse-upstream.sh
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ test_expect_success '@{u} error message when no upstream' '
test_expect_success 'branch@{u} error message with misspelt branch' '
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
- error: No upstream branch found for ${sq}no-such-branch${sq}
+ error: No such branch: ${sq}no-such-branch${sq}
fatal: Needed a single revision
EOF
error_message no-such-branch@{u} 2>actual &&
--
1.7.10.226.gfe575
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html