Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
else
if [ -z "$(git-ls-files)" ]; then
- echo >&2 Nothing to commit
+ echo >&2 "Nothing to commit (use \"git add\" include for commit)"
s/git add include/git add to include/
exit 1
fi
PARENTS=""
diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index 6e9414d..f9ed54f 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void wt_status_print_changed_cb(struct diff_queue_struct *q,
int i;
if (q->nr)
wt_status_print_header("Changed but not updated",
- "use git-add on files to include for commit");
+ "use \"git add\" on files to include for commit");
Here it's "on files", whereas in other threads people have stated that
git add adds content, so perhaps
use \"git add file1 file2\" to include for commit
which also gives a nice "simplest-possible-usage" message.
if (!shown_header) {
wt_status_print_header("Untracked files",
- "use \"git add\" to add to commit");
+ "use \"git add\" on files to include for commit");
Same here.
if (!s->commitable)
- printf("%s\n", s->amend ? "# No changes" : "nothing to commit");
+ printf("%s (use \"git add\" include for commit)\n",
+ s->amend ? "# No changes" : "Nothing to commit");
}
This is same as first one (missing "to " before "include").
It would probably be nice to use one and the same message everywhere though.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html