On 04/12/2012 09:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sign-off? Oops, I'm not really used to the whole sign-off thing. > Is create_stash (hence save_stash) the only operation that do not make > sense when HEAD is not born yet? I am wondering if it makes more sense to > either: > > (1) catch the case where HEAD is not born yet a lot earlier and do not > let the control even reach these functions (i.e. die inside the > case/esac statement at the end of the script); or > > (2) pretend as if HEAD is a commit that records an empty tree, and not > error out to begin with. > > If either one of the above turns out to make sense, then the issue this > patch addresses becomes irrelevant, so... I think it would be more consistent if stash worked without any commits having taken place so I'll look at (2). -- Ross Lagerwall
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature