Shawn Pearce wrote:
Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote:
It is nicer to let the user know when a commit succeeded all the time,
not only the first time. Also the commit sha1 is much more useful than
the tree sha1 in this case.
I agree the commit sha1 is more useful than the tree sha1, but I'm
not really sure its useful to show the commit sha1 post commit.
If you want to show something the diffstat like what git merge does
is better.
diffstats can be huge though. I'd rather have those only with -v option.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html